|
1
|
- Based on the recommendations of the NAR Special Committee on Range
Operation and Procedures
|
|
2
|
- 1. How many people have died as a result of sport rocketry over the past
15 years?
- No one has ever died doing sport rocketry.
- One.
- At least three.
|
|
3
|
- 2. A 40 pound rocket returning under an open chute at under 30 feet per
second descent rate has about the same kinetic energy as
- A bullet from a .357 magnum revolver.
- A batted baseball.
- A bowling ball dropped on your foot.
- An Alpha III lawn dart.
|
|
4
|
- 3. Repeated instances in which large rockets descend under full chute
into the parking area, missing all the cars, demonstrate that
- The safety code works!
- Wind is too unpredictable to
worry about.
- Insurance is a good thing to have.
- We may be flirting with disaster.
|
|
5
|
- Fill in the blank:
- If someone on our club flies a rocket that kills someone, what would be
the impact on the member, on our club and on our hobby?
|
|
6
|
- Pop Quiz
- Rationale
- Sport Rocketry Safety Data
- Best Safety Practices for Sport Rocketry
|
|
7
|
- NAR Safety Codes and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Codes
were designed to minimize safety risks – if they are followed!
- NAR Trained Safety Officer program contains extensive recommendations
and procedures for how to run a safe range – consult it!
- NAR Safety Committee study of October 2005 is the single most
comprehensive look at sport rocket flight safety ever done – read it!
|
|
8
|
- The sort of incidents which
occur on a sport
rocket range (e.g.,
unstable rockets, failed recovery
systems) do
occasionally lead to accidents.
- This hobby has had an excellent
safety record;
vigilance is required
to maintain it.
- When a series of serious
incidents occurs as
they have recently,
vigilance requires action.
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- On April 24, 2005 the NAR President directed a 5-member Special
Committee chaired by Dr. Jay Apt (NAR Trustee and retired NASA
astronaut) to:
- “Survey and review current NAR
range practices, procedures and operations, to provide an accurate
assessment of the relative safety and security of these practices, to
objectively analyze any significant observed threats to NAR range
safety, to recommend any changes to NAR range policy and procedures,
NFPA Codes 1122, 1125, 1127 or NAR Safety Codes to the NAR Board of
Trustees for consideration.”
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
- Overview of Safety Practices
- Sport Rocketry Safety Data
- Best Safety Practices for Sport Rocketry
|
|
13
|
- If it isn’t measured, it can’t be improved
- There have been no good statistics available on safety-related failure
rates in rocketry
- No empirical basis for formal risk analysis
- No quantitative basis for changes to safety practices, or even for
measuring improvements to safety over time
- Goal: Start fixing this problem.
- Develop solid empirical data
- Begin developing principled basis for decisions
|
|
14
|
- Safety Committee reviewed results of 6169 flights
- Validated against 2 independent data sets of 4546 and 9622 flights
- Average flight failure rate was 8.5%
- Complex (multi-motor) rockets twice as likely to fail as simple rockets
- ¾ of all failures were recovery system failures
- ¼ were powered flight phase failures
- Unstable rockets predominate
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Overview of Safety Practices
- Sport Rocketry Safety Data
- Best Safety Practices for Sport Rocketry
|
|
18
|
- Best practices start with Safety Codes and add experience-based
practices tailored to specific local circumstances and individual
rockets/fliers
- When a safety problem occurs, change the practice that let it happen
- STOP and conduct a post-event review of significant safety incidents
(including frightening near-misses)
- Lessons forgotten or unimplemented from safety incidents may be
relearned the hard way at the wrong time
|
|
19
|
- The RSO is the single person responsible for ensuring that fliers’
“right to fly” is limited by their “duty of safety” to others
- Must just say NO: if a rocket is not safe don’t let it fly; if a
situation does not look safe, STOP and take action to change it
- Bigger safety decisions are made at safety check-in than at the point of
flight control
- Focus RSO expertise and attention at both
|
|
20
|
- Electrocution from power lines
- Three fatalities in recent years due to attempts to retrieve rockets
from power lines
- Often overlooked, because “the safety code prohibits it”
- Fires
- More attention to prevention is required
- Being struck by rockets
- Probability may be on our side, but adverse consequences in the event
of injury are huge!
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- Have adequate firefighting equipment, and know how to use it!
- Fire extinguishers alone will not stop a grass fire – tools needed.
- Observe burn bans: If dry &
windy, fires may be unstoppable –don’t fly.
- Clear the area around the pads
- NFPA requires blast deflector and cleared area near launch pads.
- Specific cleared distances specified for HPR (extra for “sparky”
motors).
- Pad blankets, pre-soaking of ground can also help.
- Assign a fire watch for the
- pads; don’t just watch the flights.
- Fires at crash sites get momentum
- if people do not hurry to the site
- expecting to find one.
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- Risk of injury depends on kinetic energy and how it is absorbed by body:
No fixed danger level.
- Batted baseball: ~150 joules *
- .357 Magnum: ~750 joules
- 40-pound rocket under chute at 30 ft/sec: 759 joules
- Adult falling out of a second story window: ~3,500 joules
- The rocket that penetrated the SUV: ~7,700 joules
- The rocket on the previous page: >15,000 joules
- Impacts must occur where people are not.
- Recoveries of heavy rockets must occur at slow speeds and only in safe
places !
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
- SPLASH-predicted landing location for HPR on an I453 to 2580 ft. Both
parachute recoveries and ballistic trajectories can impact over 2580 ft.
away!
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
- Have a standard and effective procedure for warning all people on the
launch site of dangerous events.
- Reduce recovery system failures for heavy rockets through prior
inspection.
- Increase pre-flight attention to rocket flight stability
- Ensure initial thrust and launcher length and stiffness are sufficient
to achieve safe trajectory.
- Review safety incidents, and collect and review safety data from all
flights to detect trends and problems.
|
|
35
|
- Launch standoff ranges apply to spectators, photographers, and to people
returning with rockets.
- Make sure launch rods and flight paths (with weathercocking) point away
from the crowd.
- Ensure heavy rockets are landing only within launch site.
- Don’t let boost trajectories over-fly spectator/parking areas.
- If a rocket does over-fly spectators, STOP and FIX THE PROBLEM!
- Use RSO “heads up” calls, but don’t abuse them.
- Ensure they are audible in the spectator area (PA/FM).
- Have people point to the hazard to cue everyone else.
- Know who to call and what to do if an accident or injury (of any kind or
cause) happens.
|
|
36
|
- Recovery system failure is the hardest mode to prevent – and the most
dangerous!
- Rockets normally have system already packed at check-in.
- Do “peer review” of packing and structural integrity before check-in
–and if in doubt, disassemble.
- Common failure causes are detectable & preventable:
- Drag separation of heavy nose at burnout or failure of a tight-fitting
nose to separate at all.
- Weakness in shock-absorbing/anchoring system.
- Inappropriate delay time and/or trajectory = excessive ejection
velocity.
- Electronics malfunction (usually user-induced) for HPR.
- Failure to adequately restrain motor at ejection.
|
|
37
|
- Significant reduction in risk of having unpredictable trajectories can
be achieved by:
- Use of existing simulation tools to determine rocket static/dynamic
stability before flight.
- Using long-enough, stiff-enough rods (better yet, rails!)
- Compensating for effect of wind in reducing stability and causing
non-vertical flight.
- Crosswind moves Center of Pressure forward
- Increased velocity off the launcher required in wind
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
- Test every pad before a launch, measure battery charge, and
clean/replace all clips.
- Know if the launch system is “electric match” safe.
- Know what happens to launch voltage if a relay fails.
- Take care in designing safety keys, interlocks, and pad selection.
- It is very dangerous to fire one pad on a system when other pads
controlled by that system are still loading.
- Make sure LCOs understand the system each shift.
- Make sure spectators within rocket’s ballistic range are aware of
impending launches and can be warned instantly if a dangerous event
occurs.
- Public address and/or FM radio announcement.
|
|
40
|
- Our hobby’s survival in our litigious society depends on its real and
perceived safety.
- Safety occurs only when responsible people understand the risks of their
activities and make mature, informed decisions to manage them.
- Our hobby’s safety is in our hands.
|
|
41
|
- Each section should apply the lessons of this study in ways that suit
their local circumstances and fliers
- Hold a meeting with safety as the agenda and ask:
- How can we do safety check-in better to catch and correct rockets with
potential safety issues before they fly?
- How can we lay out or operate our range better to reduce the chances of
a failed rocket hitting something?
- How can we communicate better with participants and spectators to
inform them of our safety procedures and warn them rapidly of unsafe
flights?
- How can we better collect accurate data on safety incidents and use it
effectively to learn how to prevent them in future?
|
|
42
|
- 1. How many people have died as a result of sport rocketry over the past
15 years?
- No one has ever died doing sport rocketry.
- One.
- At least three.
|
|
43
|
- 2. A 40 pound rocket returning under an open chute at under 30 feet per
second descent rate has about the same kinetic energy as
- A bullet from a .357 magnum revolver.
- A batted baseball.
- A bowling ball dropped on your foot.
- An Alpha III lawn dart.
|
|
44
|
- 3. Repeated instances in which large rockets descend under full chute
into the parking area, missing all the cars, demonstrate that
- The safety code works!
- Wind is too unpredictable to
worry about.
- Insurance is a good thing to have.
- We may be flirting with disaster.
|
|
45
|
- Fill in the blank:
- If someone on our club flies a rocket that kills someone, what would be
the impact on the member, on our club and on our hobby?
- It is up to us to make sure we never have to answer this question!
|